Print this page

Sharia Law: Myths And Reality – A Sri Lankan Perspective Featured

(1 Vote)
Sharia Law: Myths And Reality – A Sri Lankan Perspective
12 August
2013
Written by:
Published in: Opinion
Sharia Law: Myths And Reality – A Sri Lankan Perspective

The concept of ‘sharia law’ or ‘Islamic law’ is a widely discussed subject for centuries. Today this concept is being largely pre-conceived by academics as well as general public around the world.

Hence the sharia law become defensive, passive, outdated and isolated (Ramadan, 2009). Misconception regarding sharia law illustrious among western nation, Muslim majority countries as well as locally in Sri Lanka, also it is not limited to non-Muslims but also for Muslim and for some Muslim intellectuals. Nature of misconception regarding sharia law vary from it macro level issues to micro level issues. Due to the misinterpretation of sharia law, by some intellectuals it made to be scary instead of being a mercy to mankind and the rest.


“Europe’s long history of religious warfare and the age of Enlightenment that followed led to the establishment, in most western countries, of a firm divide between church and state. From this divide emerged the concept that religious morality should be separated from secular law. Coming from a historical and cultural tradition defined by the separation of church and state, many westerners assume that secularization is a necessary precondition for the emergence of modern, democratic forms of government that respect universal human rights”(Elbayar, n.d.). This historically rooted divisive perspective deter from approaching to the contents of a sharia law without looking at it entirety.

In Muslim majority countries the notion of sharia law became a comfort label for ruling elites either to strength the autocratic political power base or to rally voters behind political parties to seek and / or sustain the political power base. In 1979 in Government of Pakistan with the passage of the Hudood Ordinance, and in Egypt with a 1980 amendment to the constitution stating that “the principles of the Islamic sharia are the chief source of legislation.” Recently, the newly adopted Iraqi constitution included a clause stating that “no law can be passed that contradicts the undisputed laws of Islam” (Elbayar, n.d.). Several religious political parties are gaining support all across the Muslim world, from traditionally secular countries like Turkey to Egypt, Tunisia, Jordan, Morocco, and Palestine.

Beyond the broader contextualization of the concept of sharia law within the political and legal domain, the Sharia law being criticized at several other micro level elements such as personal law, penal code, property law etc… “Some contemporary scholars fail to recognize Islamic Law as an equal to English Common Law, European Civil Law and Socialist Law. A few academics have even attempted to place Islamic Law into the Civil Law tradition. Other writers have simply added a footnote to their works on comparative justice on the religious law categories of Islamic Law” (Wiechman, et al., n.d.).

Within the Sri Lankan context the concept of sharia law was never being the subject of controversy in the past. Historically the “Sri Lanka’s legal system is a rich mix of native laws and laws that were placed by the colonial powers” (Cooray, 2008). The legal tradition in Sri Lanka is a combination of Portuguese, Roman Douche and English law in addition to customary and personal laws based on ancient customs of the Sinhalese, Tamils and Muslims. Though this diversity being well accepted within the legal domain, today among the general public of Sri Lanka there is a significant level of lack of awareness and misconception about historically rich and pluralistic legal system of our own. This lack of conscious of the richness resulted several questions among certain citizens which can be understandable. Among those questions one important question is ‘why can’t we have one (Douche) legal system despite of having various legal systems’. As these questions arise within the citizens that are logical as we lost the memory of the richness of our own pluralistic legal system we need to give answers to these questions that can let the ordinary public being confident of what we have.

This paper concentrate in brief to provide and objective take on Sharia Law considering the need of empowering the ordinary citizens of Sri Lanka and explore research gaps to the legal experts and law students of Sri Lanka to deal with.

Conception of Sharia and Sharia Law
In understanding what is sharia law it is important to understand the primary principles entrusted on believer of Islam (Muslim) and how sharia and sharia law fit to achieve its visionary objectives. The primary principles are the higher objectives of protecting the global conception of life and death, common good and interest of humankind and the universe(Ramadan, 2009).

In nutshell sharia is nothing but the best practice applicable in purifying the heart, soul and body of any given human community and diverse social contexts to build and sustain a just human society that uphold immutable values such as justice, freedom, protection, dignity, respect etc. that are Islamic and at the meantime universally shared. In this context coming up with a best practices in terms of ethics, good governance, value adding strategies, diagnosis of social problems that harmful to the humanity and the rest, considering unique desires of social, local, regional, national, and global contexts will be a part and parcel of sharia. Further the concept of sharia relates to all the domains in terms of politics and power, economy, ecology, environment, art, culture, gender issues, purification of heart etc. in addition to law and jurisprudence and simply sharia demands to purify every worldly domain for betterment of the mankind and the rest.

The term ‘sharia law’ derived from the same concept of sharia but confined to legal perspective which include critical reading, interpretation and strategies in the legal field taking in to account of the immutable values in a given changing human and social context (Ramadan, 2009). It is important to understand that sharia is broader concept than the sharia law and reducing or narrowing down the sharia in to mere legal domain is clearly misleading.

Before go in to details, I would like to highlight some main points regarding sharia. The Sharia has two brooder components; one deals with the practices and believes of a Muslim believer including rituals (e.g.: prayers, fasting) which is to attain inner peace by getting closer to God .This segment is unique to those who believe in God. So every believer struggle to attain inner peace by identify and comply with the best way which prophet Mohamed and his companions have practiced without any innovation. The second component relates application of sharia to world at large to ensure protecting the global conception of life and death, common good and interest of humankind and the universe (Ramadan, 2009). Here my article is mainly concentrating on the second components and not the first.

In substance the sharia as well as sharia law is secular in its application but in principle fully consistent to the faith of Muslim and fully acceptable for the rest of the human being as it is in compliance with universally shared values. Accordingly “Shari or sharia lawis not an exclusive concept: but it is an open system that promotes right governance falls within its scope, as we do not have an exclusive model to which we must confine ourselves” (Ramadan, 2009).

Sharia Law and its Compatibility within the Sri Lankan Legal Context
With the higher objective of sharia in mind such as justice, protecting the global conception of life and death, common good and interest of humankind and the universe(Ramadan, 2009)we can confidently state that substantial portion of the constitution of Sri Lanka as well as the legal and judicial framework is in compliance with the concept of sharia.In other word everything within the Sri Lankan constitution, the legal and judicial system that is in compliance with the higher objectives are in compliance with sharia and we as a citizens of this country have a moral duty to ensure that the constitution as well as legal and judicial system are in consistent with the immutable values that are Islamic and universally shared.

As sharia is the way or path toward compliance to the principles of justice, continued study of legal and judicial framework as well as the constitution of Sri Lanka can confirm the applicability of it in the changing context or can add alternatives or spot light on area where legal system need to be renewed to cater the changing context. Accordingly sharia demand from Sri Lankan Muslims take responsibility to contribute as much as they can to promote justice and freedom in all spheres until the higher objective of justice, protecting the global conception of life and death, common good and interest of humankind and the universe are guaranteed to the entire citizens of the country.

In today’s contemporary world, the understanding about the notion of sharia is completely away from the higher value of sharia among most of Muslims and non-Muslims and confined to a very smaller segment. The Sri Lankan societies also are not exception to this global miss-conception.

For example as I stated earlier sharia is not confined to one particular model but to the higher values such as justice, and freedom that are universally shared. Accordingly at the outset having various legal models such as English law, douche law, Kandiyan law, thesawalami law, Muslim marriage law, property law that are comfortable to accustom various social groups can be acceptable in terms of sharia as far as these models respect the immutable values of social justice and freedom that are shared universally. Having said that today, we need to understand that over a period of time the changing dynamics of the social groups and growing complexities cause to these models to change within in order to ensure the adherence of the higher objectives.

Accordingly the legal and judicial experts and potential legal and judicial experts of Sri Lankan citizens both Muslims and non-Muslims need to assess their position on several issues within the legal domain. As I stressed several times sharia is nothing but in principle to ensure justice and freedom to mankind and rest this is not the only expectations of Muslims but universally shared and therefor in principle there cannot be a counter argument against the sharia. Therefore as far as Muslims, any effort undertaken by anyone within legal and judicial framework to ensure justice and freedom such effort that is fully complies with sharia.

When it comes to contributing in the field of ethics, law and jurisprudence with adherence to higher objectives of maintaining justice, freedom and mercy to the Sri Lankan citizens it is a shared responsibility of every concerned citizen of this country and the same responsibility indeed the portrayed Muslims through their faith. Therefore it is very clear that responsibility toward law and judicial reform is common and shared to all communities secular itself as well as fully consistent with faith of Muslims.

A Way Forward

Accordingly the sharia perspective can significantly add value to the governance structure and law and jurisprudence by motivating all concerned Muslims citizens of Sri Lanka to contribute their level best to reform and ensure the existence of a living system that fully comply with higher objectives. There is no reason to contradict with the concept of sharia in principle as it is not confined to a particular model but stress the application of higher principles consistently.

Within the Sri Lankan Muslims unfortunately the term sharia and its visionary higher values and principles are not understood or largely a distorted subject and heavily commercialized. For example when we discuss about finance related product or service, today we can see in financial market, there are several services with the brand of ‘Islamic’ that comes together with conventional services to banking, insurance and lease. Here we can see the inconsistent in terms of adopting higher principle and the motive of adding the ‘Islamic’ label is merely to attract the growing market internally and around the world today.

Therefore Sri Lankan Muslims intellectuals in general and those who were in the field of law and jurisprudence in particular get the major part of the responsibility as they have to get equipped with the higher objectives of sharia and to reform the understanding of the same within themselves as well as sharing the principle based perspective with fellow citizens of this country and moving toward better governance and legal systems.

While accepting the plurality of the legal system, the Muslim legal experts and researchers should find a way to research and propose in every domain including marriage law, property law their perspective that is fully consistent with higher objective of Islam and at the same time applicable in a secular environment.

Reference

Cooray, A., 2008. Oriental and Occidental Laws in Harmonious Co-existence: The Case of Trusts in Sri Lanka. Electronic Journal of Comparative Law, May.12(1).

Elbayar, K., n.d. Reclaiming Tradition: Islamic Law in a Modern World. [Online]

Available at: http://www.iar-gwu.org/node/23
[Accessed 27 March 2013].

Ramadan, T., 2009. Radical Reform Islamic Ethics and Liberation. New York: Oxford University Press.

Wiechman, D. J., Kendall, J. D. & Mohammad, n.d. Islamic Law: Myths and Realities. [Online]

Available at: http://www.iium.edu.my/deed/lawbase/ilw_myth_real.html

Courtesy
Colombo Telegraph
URL: http://www.colombotelegraph.com/index.php/sharia-law-myths-and-reality-a-sri-lankan-perspective/

Read 170031 times Last modified on Friday, 30 August 2013 07:08
UmmuHana

UmmuHana is a reformer, political analyst and social and human rights activist who writes in English and Tamil. UmmuHana contributes on various domains including Pluralism, Reform, Policy review & development and  and cultural studies.

Email: info@ummuhana.com